Return-Path: Received: from olympus.net ([198.133.237.1]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.1 release 219 ID# 0-52269U2500L250S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 20 Sep 1999 01:39:29 -0400 Received: from ptpm092.olympus.net ([198.133.237.122] helo=2thman) by olympus.net with smtp (Exim 2.02 #1) id 11SwEQ-0006TI-00 for lancair.list@olsusa.com; Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:43:19 -0700 Message-ID: <003501bf032b$ff211b20$7aed85c6@2thman> From: "Barrett/Burns" <2thman@olympus.net> To: "Lancair List" Subject: speed brakes Date: Sun, 19 Sep 1999 22:46:30 -0700 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Tom, I'll start by confessing that I'm not using Bill's SB's and I haven't seen the PF electric ones. But I would have used Bill's if they'd been around before I built my hydraulic ones. PF, of course, was offering a cable pull SB prior to Bill's invention and only came out with their electric system AB (after Bill). I'm told that Bill's have superior electronics and failsafe devices built in. I have flown an airplane with Bill's SB's installed and I have flown the earlier PF SB's - There's no question about the difference. Bill's wins out in a New York second. If there isn't some great price differential that makes PF's SB's attractive, then I'd say go with the sure winner. I've seen the workmanship and watched as Bill developed his product and it amazes me that he could build something with this high quality and sophistication in his barn. Regards, John Barrett >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html