X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 10:59:31 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [216.148.227.153] (HELO rwcrmhc12.comcast.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.5) with ESMTP id 900818 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:12:03 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.148.227.153; envelope-from=mjrav@comcast.net Received: from mark1 (c-65-96-140-242.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[65.96.140.242]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc13) with SMTP id <20051225121116015004s6o8e>; Sun, 25 Dec 2005 12:11:17 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <004b01c6094c$ba0ebb90$f28c6041@mark1> From: "Mark Ravinski" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: Where has all the power gone? X-Original-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 07:14:11 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0048_01C60922.CDC9F2A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C60922.CDC9F2A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Listers, Thanks for the great technical discussion. Is there a practical way to establish more exact timing? I have one Electroair and one LSE system on my IO360 with 9:1 = compression. When using an inductive timing light, indications are very jumpy and = seem unreliable. I've noted that others have had this problem also. Is it possible to determine a "best " setting based on other operating = parameters? As an example, I'm thinking of the "lean test" as being used to analyze = the relative performance of different cylinders. I know that overheating can be a symptom of too much advance. Is there = any useful correlation? Thanks, Mark Ravinski N360KB 1361 hrs. ------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C60922.CDC9F2A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Listers,

Thanks for the great technical=20 discussion.

Is there a practical way to establish = more exact=20 timing?

I have one Electroair and one LSE = system on my=20 IO360 with 9:1 compression.

When using an inductive timing light, = indications=20 are very jumpy and seem unreliable.

I've noted that others have had this = problem=20 also.

Is it possible to determine a "best " = setting based=20 on other operating parameters?

As an example, I'm thinking of the = "lean test" as=20 being used to analyze the relative performance of different=20 cylinders.

I know that overheating can be a = symptom of too=20 much advance. Is there any useful correlation?

Thanks,

Mark Ravinski

N360KB 1361 hrs.

------=_NextPart_000_0048_01C60922.CDC9F2A0--