X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 22:34:32 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from secure5.liveoakhosting.com ([64.49.254.21] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.5) with ESMTPS id 900624 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 24 Dec 2005 21:42:36 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com Received: (qmail 12231 invoked from network); 24 Dec 2005 20:41:47 -0600 Received: from ip68-108-237-23.br.no.cox.net (HELO ?10.0.1.4?) (68.108.237.23) by rs5.liveoakhosting.com with SMTP; 24 Dec 2005 20:41:47 -0600 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: <552bedfbab944ba4f5bfbcb465cb0245@advancedpilot.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Walter Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Where has all the power gone? X-Original-Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2005 20:41:46 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) John: 1) the burn isn't really *faster*, it just gets started quicker... but that's pretty much the same result. 2) That's waaaay to many variables to give you an answer. I really don't have a specific value for you. Wish I did. Sorry. Walter On Dec 24, 2005, at 8:16 PM, Marvin Kaye wrote: Posted for John Huft : Walter Yes, I now see what you are saying. I did not read your earlier post carefully enough. You are saying that 3x the spark energy, across the .032" gap of two spark plugs, causes a faster burn than the normal magneto sparking .018" gaps. How about, for once please, some numbers. Choose any engine you like, and tell me, when you change from magneto to EI: How many degrees Theta PP moves? What is the change in horsepower produced? Perhaps, even, what is the change in CHT resulting? Thanks you, John -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/