Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:23:58 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-894191@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.49.254.21; envelope-from=walter@advancedpilot.com
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623)
In-Reply-To: <list-893766@logan.com>
References: <list-893766@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Where has all the power gone?

Skip:

**Can you explain why spark advance is a good idea in auto engines and 
a bad one in airplanes?**

It's not necessarily.   It all depends on the power and fuel being used.

You can actually gain power in an aircraft engine at takeoff power by 
RETARDING the timing from the historically chosen timing.  That has 
several advantages.

OTOH, you can gain power in cruise in most situations (NA) by advancing 
the timing during that power demand.

If the thetaPP is 10 like it is at takeoff, retarding the timing will 
make more HP.  If it is 25, like it can be in cruise, advancing the 
timing will increase output.   IOW, if the thetaPP is 16 and you 
advance OR retard the timing, the power output goes down.

The objective is to have a thetaPP of 16dATDC in all conditions.  That 
results in the most mechanical advantage for the fuel charge being 
burned.  It improves the BSFC.

Water-cooled, iron-head engines have a wider detonation margin and 
withstand detonation a lot better than our aircraft engines, so we need 
to pay closer attention to these issues.

Walter