X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.4) with HTTP id 894188 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:23:04 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Where has all the power gone? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.4 Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:23:04 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <43AC2A50.7030106@lazy8.net> References: <43AC2A50.7030106@lazy8.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for John Huft : Well, Walter, if you look at my entire post... "On my normally aspirated engine, the LSE does not advance timing at all for the case of full power (i.e. 2700 rpm and > 26 in. Hg. manifold pressure). So, I would not think the advance curve comes into play in a full power run on the dyno. I doubt that the stronger spark causes a power loss." You see, I just said that there was no timing change at > 26" MAP, so, then, a stronger spark is not going to cause a power loss. Obviously, if you change the timing, you change everything. In my airplane, I have the digital display readout of the actual timing advance provided by the LSE. So, I can watch what it is doing at different power settings. With ram air at low altitudes, I have seen 31" MAP, and from there down to at least 26, the timing remains at baseline (for my engine, 20 degrees BTDC), even at high RPM. I can't say what it would do at 40" MAP, that is a question for Klaus. John p.s. Yeah, I did some dumb things during my high school hot-rodding days, but then, I still do :o)