X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 22:08:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-d03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.157.35] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 862823 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:15:41 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.157.35; envelope-from=MikeEasley@aol.com Received: from MikeEasley@aol.com by imo-d03.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v38_r6.3.) id q.285.119f28b (14374) for ; Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:14:55 -0500 (EST) From: MikeEasley@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <285.119f28b.30c46ffe@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 11:14:54 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Flying in primer question X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1133712894" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5300 X-Spam-Flag: NO -------------------------------1133712894 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not sure if this was addressed, but maybe the turbulence around the static ports is creating a lower pressure at the ports and a higher indicated airspeed. Mike Easley -------------------------------1133712894 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I'm not sure if this was addressed, but maybe the turbulence around the= =20 static ports is creating a lower pressure at the ports and a higher indicate= d=20 airspeed.

Mike Easley

-------------------------------1133712894--