X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 23:52:57 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc11.comcast.net ([204.127.202.55] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.3) with ESMTP id 861502 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 22:19:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.127.202.55; envelope-from=N4ZQ@comcast.net Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-147-92-140.hsd1.ma.comcast.net[24.147.92.140]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc11) with SMTP id <2005120303185601100aflhje>; Sat, 3 Dec 2005 03:19:06 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Greenbacks, Ltd." Subject: Re: LNC2 Exhausting effort X-Original-Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2005 22:18:56 -0500 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Any of you out there got some pics showing how you supported the two tailpipes? How much flexibility is required, given the fact that the exhaust manifolds are rigid and yet the tailpipes would be supported at either the engine mount or the firewall? Obviously there is some ability for flexing at the tailpipes where they clamp to the exhaust manifolds but the aft end of these pipes would need to flex as well. My concern is that I might wind up making the tailpipe supports too stiff. Angier Ames N4ZQ N3ZQ