X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 5.0.3) with HTTP id 861171 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:13:17 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: IV-P Exhaust Tunnels To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser v5.0.3 Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2005 18:13:17 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9D38C54E-C8FF-4E38-AA7D-CB00B87D1AD0@adelphia.net> References: <9D38C54E-C8FF-4E38-AA7D-CB00B87D1AD0@adelphia.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Gary Casey : Craig, I'm sure that .020 is plenty of clearances as you just don't want the aluminum to touch and even if it touches it a few spots it will still do the job pretty well (of course, it touches where you bolt it in place). I would certainly worry a little bit about vibration, but if the aluminum is curved it will be pretty stiff and not subject to a low frequency resonance. I'm thinking about clamping an aluminum shield to the pipe itself, but you would have a problem doing that, what with the odd shape of the turbocharger. To use an aluminum radiation shield on the pipe it would be necessary to use stainless pieces as spacers since the pipe will be at a temperature higher than the melting point of aluminum. And then clamping a shield to the pipe would expose it to extreme vibration, requiring a sturdy clamping system. Advantage is that it would reduce the temperature of all nearby engine compartment components, not just the cowl. Gary Casey > I am thinking through adding a .020" thick stainless heat shield