Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 00:48:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.1) with ESMTP id 822207 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:41:48 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([70.61.176.137]) by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ASMTP id CQN38002 for ; Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:41:01 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <436FBBDC.9060809@ustek.com> X-Original-Date: Mon, 07 Nov 2005 15:41:00 -0500 From: N301ES Reply-To: lancair@ustek.com Organization: USTEK Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040804 Netscape/7.2 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Re: A Sad Saga: Trials and tribulations of buying major aircraft compo... References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------020409070502010504050003" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020409070502010504050003 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The engine builder is very well known for quality - or I would not have ordered from them. However I had been told by others that they tend to let delivery dates slip a little and in my case they let it slip a lot. I have already received e-mails from 2 others with the same experience. Perhaps this exposure will shock them into running a tighter ship. Two hours after the LML posting I received an e-mail that the engine would ship this afternoon. I may not get airborne in December but January should see the world's first flying ES-P(xl). Thanks for all your help and support Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES Sky2high@aol.com wrote: > In a message dated 11/7/2005 11:40:10 A.M. Central Standard Time, > lancair@ustek.com writes: > > Anyone else have these > problems, and what should our fellow builders do to avoid them? > > Who is the builder? > > Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk > Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96 > Aurora, IL (KARR) > > > --------------020409070502010504050003 Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit The engine builder is very well known for quality - or I would not have ordered from them.  However I had been told by others that they tend to let delivery dates slip a little and in my case they let it slip a lot.  I have already received e-mails from 2 others with the same experience.  Perhaps this exposure will shock them into running a tighter ship.  Two hours after the LML posting I received an e-mail that the engine would ship this afternoon.  I may not get airborne in December but January should see the world's first flying ES-P(xl). 


Thanks for all your help and support


Robert M. Simon,  ES-P N301ES


Sky2high@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 11/7/2005 11:40:10 A.M. Central Standard Time, lancair@ustek.com writes:
Anyone else have these
problems, and what should our fellow builders do to avoid them?
Who is the builder?
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 SB 89/96
Aurora, IL (KARR)



--------------020409070502010504050003--