X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.162.121] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3.5) with HTTP id 1023548 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:24:30 -0400 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] On Boosting Engines, Stressing Crankshaft and TBO To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3.5 Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2005 15:24:30 -0400 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5692da0826a7a7650106b5a9e1a0da21@advancedpilot.com> References: <5692da0826a7a7650106b5a9e1a0da21@advancedpilot.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for Walter Atkinson : Alain: I think you're on the right track. 1) FYI, the jury in the Lycoming case had two engineers and one pilot serving. It appears to have been an educated and thoughtful jury. 2) If you have ever seen crankshaft torsionals on a running engine, you would be very concerned about boosting the power without doing a run on a test stand to MEASURE these effects. They can be huge and they can be significantly affected by things like RPM and peak power pulse. A normal crankshaft torsional value could easily be in the +/- 3000 pound range. This large plus-minus force reversal is realized as many as 7 or 8 thousand times per minute. Crankshafts live a difficult life. 3) There has been compelling evidence shown that the Lycoming crankshaft problem is one of design, not manufacture. Walter