X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 15:03:37 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from HQEMGATE03.nvidia.com ([216.228.112.143] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 948821 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 18 May 2005 12:54:57 -0400 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.228.112.143; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from hqemfe03.nvidia.com (Not Verified[172.16.227.123]) by HQEMGATE03.nvidia.com id ; Wed, 18 May 2005 09:57:44 -0700 Received: from thelma.nvidia.com ([172.16.228.84]) by hqemfe03.nvidia.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Wed, 18 May 2005 09:54:10 -0700 Received: from ccaselt (cvpn-16-119.nvidia.com [10.2.16.119]) by thelma.nvidia.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA13857 for ; Wed, 18 May 2005 09:54:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <08a301c55bca$36e69650$7104020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: Subject: IV fuel valve question X-Original-Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 09:54:06 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_089E_01C55B8F.876A2AA0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Original-Return-Path: colyncase@earthlink.net X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2005 16:54:10.0315 (UTC) FILETIME=[365775B0:01C55BCA] This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_089E_01C55B8F.876A2AA0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a IVP with the usual left/right/off , supply + return, fuel = valve. I have a third tank to plumb in. My thought was to put a second valve on the way to the right tank. This would be exactly the same kind of valve and would select between = right (wing) tank and aux (baggage area) tank. So it would look like this: engine ^ | | | left wing -> main valve <--2nd valve--<- right wing ^ | aux tank So this is full retun on all tanks and I should be able to=20 run directly from any tank. Can anyone think of a reason why this valve arrangement would not work reliably? Colyn ------=_NextPart_000_089E_01C55B8F.876A2AA0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I have a IVP with the usual = left/right/off , supply=20 + return, fuel valve.

I have a third tank to plumb = in.

My thought was to put a second valve on = the way to=20 the right tank.

This would be exactly the same kind of = valve and=20 would select between right (wing) tank and

aux (baggage area) tank.

So it would look like = this:

&nbs= p; engine

&nbs= p; =20 ^

&nbs= p; |

left wing -> main valve <--2nd = valve--<-=20 right wing

&nbs= p; = ; =20 ^

&nbs= p; = ; =20 |

&nbs= p; = ; =20 aux tank

So this is full retun on all tanks = and I should=20 be able to

run directly from any = tank.

Can anyone think of a reason why this = valve=20 arrangement would

not work reliably?

Colyn

------=_NextPart_000_089E_01C55B8F.876A2AA0--