X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:02:36 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [129.116.87.170] (HELO MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5) with ESMTP id 939767 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 May 2005 10:14:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=129.116.87.170; envelope-from=mark.steitle@austin.utexas.edu X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C55633.A2040CAA" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Factory Inspections??? X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 09:13:41 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <87DBA06C9A5CB84B80439BA09D86E69E016C189F@MAIL01.austin.utexas.edu> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Factory Inspections??? Thread-Index: AcVWLaQGv5BnBElBQlKsiJqHI0XxmAABWS+w From: "Mark R Steitle" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C55633.A2040CAA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Scott is the one who told me of the requirement. Said AIG was requiring it. I told him I had used the EAA technical counselor courtesy inspection, but I had never heard of a factory inspection program. He also stated that AIG wouldn't insure it unless I had used the Lancair builder's assist program. He later dropped that "requirement". Sounded real fishy to me. =20 Mark S. =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of N301ES Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2005 8:31 AM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Factory Inspections??? =20 I have builder's risk insurance through Skysmith ( see http://www.skysmith.com/ ) with AIG, including terrorism loss (like a terrorist will steasl a kit in process!), and there are no such inspection requirements. Sounds strange to me. Call Scott at Skysmith: 800/743-1439. =20 Robert M. Simon, ES-P N301ES. =20 Mark R Steitle wrote:=20 Now AIG is stating that I must have inspections performed by a Lancair factory representative at designated points in the building process. These are separate from the EAA technical inspector's inspections.=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C55633.A2040CAA Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Scott is the one who told me of the requirement.  Said AIG was requiring it.  I told him I had = used the EAA technical counselor courtesy inspection, but I had never heard of a = factory inspection program.  He also stated that AIG wouldn’t insure = it unless I had used the Lancair builder’s assist program.  He later = dropped that “requirement”.  Sounded real fishy to me.

 

Mark = S.

 

From: Lancair Mailing = List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of N301ES
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, = 2005 8:31 AM
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: = Factory Inspections???

 

I have builder's risk insurance through = Skysmith ( see http://www.skysmith.com/ ) with = AIG, including terrorism loss (like a terrorist will steasl a kit in = process!), and there are no such inspection requirements.  Sounds strange to = me.  Call Scott at Skysmith:  800/743-1439. 


Robert M. Simon,  ES-P N301ES. 


Mark R Steitle wrote:

Now AIG is stating that I must have = inspections performed by a Lancair factory representative at designated points in = the building process.  These are separate from the EAA technical inspector’s inspections. =

------_=_NextPart_001_01C55633.A2040CAA--