X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 09:37:34 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-921173@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c5)
  with ESMTP id 920679 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:32:50 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu
Received: from HP780N (cpe-066-057-255-054.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.255.54])
	by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j3UJW2Y5028643
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:32:04 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Matt Hapgood" <hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] Re: 360 temperature question?
X-Original-Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 15:32:06 -0400
X-Original-Message-ID: <MMEELOPNFCJLIMPNNKMOCEBLDMAA.hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <list-920550@logan.com>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine

Mark,

Thanks a ton for the suggestions.

I did switch to multigrade- obviously too soon.  I'm going back to
multigrade tomorrow.

Compression was 74, 74, 72, 74 over 80.

I've been playing with the timing and can get a bit more CHT.  I do intend
to raise the timing some.  But it doesn't make enough of a difference.

I'll try to the suggestion on the electrical interference.  Like your
problem, mine is only at high RPM.  It's driving me up the wall.

Matt

ps.  aren't excess speed problems frustrating? (don't forget, I have a 200
HP angle valve to explain the speed).