Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 08:06:50 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.100] (HELO ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 882613 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:17:11 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.100; envelope-from=hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu Received: from HP780N (cpe-065-184-084-150.nc.res.rr.com [65.184.84.150]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j3IMGLLw027312 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:16:22 -0400 (EDT) From: "Matt Hapgood" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: max range vs. max endurance X-Original-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 18:16:30 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Importance: Normal In-reply-to: X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Can someone explain to me if this makes sense (Max endurance has greater range than max range)? Conceptually this doesn't make sense to me... The data is from Lancair Production website for the 400. Cruise Data Max Power Speed (FL180) . . . . . . . . . . 230 KTAS (265 mph) Max Recommended Cruise Power Speed (FL25) . 235 KTAS (270 mph) Max Range (65% Power, FL180, 200 KTAS). . . 1071 Nautical Miles* Max Endurance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1320 Nautical Miles* -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/