Farnsworth wrote:
<>Though the cost is slightly higher, I say again, a
feathering prop is inexpensive
insurance! >
<>Lynn Farnsworth, Super Legacy #235
(flying), ><>TSIO-550, Race #44
>
Based on recommendations I purchased the MT 4-blade feathering
prop. Now I am faced with having to shut down in flight and test the darn
thing - or does anyone have ES (or even IV) glide ratio numbers comparing a wind
milling prop and a fully feathered version?
Robert M.
Simon, ES-P N301ES
To Robert and Lynn, others;
I have the MT 4 Blade on my L4P. the difference in vertical decent with the
engine at idle and going form Fine pitch to Course pitch is 3500 fpm. A giant
difference. With the 4 blade it is like a brake at fine pitch. However, others
have told me that at course pitch they calculated a glide ratio of up to 25 to
One. amazing but the speed it up there. I needed a glide number to put in the
SFS EFIS because it shows a blue glide range around the airplane, corrected for
wind and terrain. We all agreed on a more realistic 15 to One.
One caution that I can think of with a full feathering prop is that you
need a unfeathering accumulator if you want to get it windmilling and started
again, otherwise you only have the starter. That said, I think Brent and Orin
both lost a Turbo hose while at altitude and the engine quit from too much gas.
I think Bent finally got it started at a lower altitude before landing. He can
tell the true story, maybe? If you need more than 25/1 glide ratio than a full
feathering prop will help.
My thoughts only,
Jim Hergert
N6XE (An
Sexy)