X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:59:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [198.36.178.141] (HELO stoel.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c4) with ESMTP id 866692 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 16:56:54 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=198.36.178.141; envelope-from=CSLEWIS@stoel.com Received: from sea-mx1.stoel.com ([172.17.103.4]) by gateway1.stoel.com with ESMTP id <334131>; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 14:06:38 -0700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01C53FA2.0AC7C9D5" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Engine Failure X-Original-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 13:56:04 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Engine Failure Thread-Index: AcU/oLUUM+wat2l+Ro+JWTld3Y3TXAAAKayA From: "Lewis III, Charles S." X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53FA2.0AC7C9D5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Lynn: =20 Since you seem to have considered both, do you know what the weight = difference is for your feathering prop, compared to my Hartzell = three-blade? =20 Thanks. =20 Carl Lewis L2K-203, N14CL IO-550 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of = Farnsworth Sent: Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:46 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: Engine Failure =20 The glide performance gain with the feathering prop is significant = enough to warrant serious consideration over a non feathering prop. This = performance gain increases your options. =20 =20 * * * * =20 Though the cost is slightly higher, I say again, a feathering prop is = inexpensive insurance!=20 Lynn Farnsworth Super Legacy #235 (flying) TSIO-550 Race #44=20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53FA2.0AC7C9D5 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Lynn:
 
Since=20 you seem to have considered both, do you know what the weight difference = is for=20 your feathering prop, compared to my Hartzell = three-blade?
 
Thanks.
 
Carl=20 Lewis
L2K-203, N14CL
IO-550
-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing = List=20 [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of = Farnsworth
Sent:=20 Tuesday, April 12, 2005 1:46 PM
To: Lancair Mailing=20 List
Subject: [LML] Re: Engine Failure

 
The = glide=20 performance gain with the feathering prop is significant enough to = warrant=20 serious consideration over a non feathering prop. This = performance gain=20 increases your options.  
 
* * * *=20  
Though the cost is=20 slightly higher, I say again, a feathering prop is = inexpensive=20 insurance! 
Lynn = Farnsworth
Super Legacy #235=20 (flying)
TSIO-550
Race=20 = #44 
= ------_=_NextPart_001_01C53FA2.0AC7C9D5--