Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 14:30:39 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [137.118.16.124] (HELO relay0.av-mx.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c3) with ESMTP id 812450 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:17:47 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=137.118.16.124; envelope-from=pinetownd@volcano.net X-Virus-Scan-Time: 0 Received: from [137.118.16.60] (HELO mx2.av-mx.com) by relay0.av-mx.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.7) with SMTP id 80232580 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:17:02 -0500 Received: (qmail 14690 invoked from network); 20 Mar 2005 18:17:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO DennisDell) (pinetownd@volcano.net@65.172.208.182) by 0 with SMTP; 20 Mar 2005 18:17:02 -0000 X-CLIENT-IP: 65.172.208.182 X-CLIENT-HOST: unknown X-Original-Message-ID: <004d01c52d79$01310650$6401a8c0@DennisDell> From: "Dennis Johnson" X-Original-To: Subject: SuperFil vs. Aeropoxy Light X-Original-Date: Sun, 20 Mar 2005 10:16:57 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_004A_01C52D35.F2459450" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C52D35.F2459450 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Greetings, I'm using SuperFil and Aeropoxy Light, as well as micro, and have = observed a significant difference between the two. SuperFil tends to flow-out as it cures, while Aeropoxy Light doesn't. = If the surface I'm filling is level, I use SuperFil. It will flow = together as it cures, filling the pinholes that were created when I = applied it. On the other hand, SuperFil on a vertical surface will sag = significantly, leaving a low spot where you wanted filler and a high = spot downhill from it. =20 I use Aeropoxy Light on vertical surfaces because it stays put and will = not sag. But it's lack of flow-out also leaves pinholes and voids = unfilled. Of course, if your spreading technique is better than mine, = you might not have pinholes and voids to fill. SuperFil also remains workable longer than Aeropoxy Light, although both = are slow enough that I've never had a problem when mixing small batches. Dennis Johnson Legacy #257 ------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C52D35.F2459450 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Greetings,

I'm using SuperFil and Aeropoxy Light, as well as micro, and have=20 observed a significant difference between the two.

SuperFil tends to flow-out as it cures, while Aeropoxy Light=20 doesn't. If the surface I'm filling is level, I use = SuperFil. =20 It will flow together as it cures, filling the pinholes that were = created when=20 I applied it. On the other hand, SuperFil on a vertical = surface will=20 sag significantly, leaving a low spot where you wanted filler and a high = spot=20 downhill from it.

I use Aeropoxy Light on vertical surfaces because it stays put=20 and will not sag. But it's lack of flow-out also leaves = pinholes and=20 voids unfilled. Of course, if your spreading technique is better = than=20 mine, you might not have pinholes and voids to fill.

SuperFil also remains workable longer than Aeropoxy Light, although = both=20 are slow enough that I've never had a problem when mixing small = batches.

Dennis Johnson

Legacy #257

------=_NextPart_000_004A_01C52D35.F2459450--