Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2005 21:48:28 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-796902@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.241.27; envelope-from=rickschrameck@cox.net
User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: supershargers
From: rickschrameck <rickschrameck@cox.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-796709@logan.com>
Mime-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit


Walter,
I love to talk to racers.  I fly the exact stock engine nearly every day.
It has a different tune on it but my plane is truly a Sport racer.  The week
before the 2003 Reno races I was not going to compete because of the time I
was spending on the Epic program.  I received a call from the Reno Sport
guys and was asked to consider racing.  I changed the oil and filter, put in
new spark plugs did a full condition and flew to Reno.  I changed the fuel
flow and that was all the race prep I did from my daily flying set up.

You can race a stock, Supercharged aircraft that you fly everyday and be
competitive.

MY ENGINE IS COMPLETLY STOCK.

There are no other issues.  The Supercharger is a great solution for flying
and I have proved it with my aircraft.

Regards,

Rick

on 3/16/05 4:37 PM, Marvin Kaye at marv@lancaironline.net wrote:

> Posted for Walter Atkinson <walter@advancedpilot.com>:
> 
> Rick:
> 
> Congratulations on your success.  I have been part of a race team in Reno as
> well.  (we scored three GOLD second place finishes in T-6s.)  I also raced a
> Porsche in the Mexico City Grand Prix, so auto racing is not foreign to me
> either.  It's a rush but it does require a different set of issues being
> addressed than engines which are used for every day use and have different
> longevity and efficiency concerns.  If I were to race my airplane, I would
> make some changes in the current engine set-up.
> 
> No one is taking issue with your racing success using that supercharger
> system. That is a very different issue than the normal flying conditions we
> encounter as pilots of GA aircraft and as I have pointed out, the problems of
> the gear/belt-driven superchargers are minimized at WOT....  as in the
> condition you have listed.  There is no disagreement on that.  Again,
> congratulations.
> 
> I would suggest that being intercooled would be a much better situation for
> your engine and it could have made up the difference in being second place.
> That also would increase the detonation margin for you.  IN YOUR CASE, being
> intercooled could increase the HP output since there is no exhaust
> backpressure issue.
> 
> Walter
> 
> 
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/