Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.227] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.3c2)
  with HTTP id 795377 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:40:55 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: supershargers
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.3c2
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 21:40:55 -0500
Message-ID: <web-795377@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <BE5CC791.854B%rickschrameck@cox.net>
References: <BE5CC791.854B%rickschrameck@cox.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for rickschrameck <rickschrameck@cox.net>:

  All of the comments from the group are interesting.  But lets put the rubber
  on the road.
  
  I have a clear understanding of the benefits of Turbocharging and
  Supercharging.
  
  You all are talking about efficiencies and everything without looking at a
  simple yet absolute truth.
  
  I hold the World Speed Record at 347 MPH with a stock engine without
  intercoolers.
  
  Daryl and I raced to first and second in the gold at Reno 2003.  Our planes
  were less than 5 feet apart at the finish.  I have photo proof.
  
  There are two ways to skin the cat and they both have their good points and
  bad points.
  
  I have raced cars and airplanes for 40 years and racing is about
  efficiencies.  Reno was the proof all the rest is interesting physics
  without the all the information.
  
  I have raced my plane against the best Turbocharged full race, intercooled
  trick TSIO 550 in the world ond lost by 5 feet.  I would be willing to put
  my stock Supercharged engine on GAMI's dyno with a TSIO 550 and match power
  and performance any day.
  
  Rick