Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:55:37 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp.perigee.net ([166.82.201.14] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 794814 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:09:29 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=166.82.201.14; envelope-from=jschroeder@perigee.net Received: from john-study.home_wireless (dsl-208-26-41-156.perigee.net [208.26.41.156]) by smtp.perigee.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j2FJ8fvc025757 for ; Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:08:42 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: Re: [LML] SuperFil References: X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 14:08:39 -0500 From: "John Schroeder" Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; delsp=yes; charset=iso-8859-15 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Opera M2/7.54 (Win32, build 3929) We've used the stuff and it has some drawbacks. IOHO. I think it is harder to mix than micro and harder to spread. We've tried all of the techniquers - hit spatulae/spreaders, etc. It sands better, but also takes longer to cure than micro. YMMV, John >> Has anyone used this product? > > http://www.wicksaircraft.com/catalog/product_cat.php/subid=1890/index.html > > I purchased a small (1 Qt) size and it's a dream to work with; trowels on > smoothly, mixes easily (and consistently) and sands like a dream. > Question is how about durability and paintability?