Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 12:09:55 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [199.185.220.220] (HELO priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 773717 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 11:58:16 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=199.185.220.220; envelope-from=npaczkowski@telus.net Received: from dad ([64.180.168.195]) by priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050307165730.IRFN16712.priv-edtnes57.telusplanet.net@dad> for ; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 09:57:30 -0700 From: "Nicholas Paczkowski" X-Original-To: Subject: LIV WLS Primer X-Original-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 08:56:55 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C522F3.9D8C1D90" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcUjNqqFbiDXsBcETNWA28loa+3vBA== Disposition-Notification-To: "Nicholas Paczkowski" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C522F3.9D8C1D90 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I intend to apply the WLS with a roller. Is pinholing a problem with WLS? Other than sanding, should I prepare the surface in way other than sanding to avoid pinholing? Thanks ------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C522F3.9D8C1D90 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I = intend to apply=20 the WLS with a roller. Is pinholing a problem with WLS? Other than = sanding,=20 should I prepare the surface in way other than sanding to avoid = pinholing?=20 Thanks
------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C522F3.9D8C1D90--