Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:38:44 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-773481@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <eskesen@dakotacom.net>
Received: from breaker.dakotacom.net ([66.192.152.146] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 773458 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 07 Mar 2005 09:14:48 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.192.152.146; envelope-from=eskesen@dakotacom.net
Received: from 58chu (ppp247.usr03.tus.dakotacom.net [69.9.29.248])
	by breaker.dakotacom.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with SMTP id j27EE0KO028079
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 7 Mar 2005 07:14:01 -0700 (MST)
X-Original-Message-ID: <003001c52320$4f0b6680$f81d0945@58chu>
Reply-To: "Eskesen" <eskesen@dakotacom.net>
From: "Eskesen" <eskesen@dakotacom.net>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: LNC 2 Alternator (14V)
X-Original-Date: Mon, 7 Mar 2005 07:16:49 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106

Thanks to all who responded to my question about an alternate (!)
alternator.  One of you asked why I continued to use the same alternator !
Well, there are two answers to that, --- I prefer to respond by saying that
I'm an optimist.

All respondents recommended either B&C or NipponDenzo.  What ever one that I
settle on, I will continue to use an external voltage regulator with over
voltage protection.  This has been discussed and the relevant postings can
be found in the LML archives.

Byron Eskesen
Tucson, AZ