Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 15:00:15 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-772736@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com>
Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2)
  with ESMTP id 772611 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 13:42:25 -0500
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com
Received: from asdmngwia.udlp.com (asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com [10.1.62.22])
	by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j26GYTu2003197
	for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:34:29 -0600
Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.udlp.com
	with Novell_GroupWise; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:41:34 -0600
X-Original-Message-Id: <s22afa7e.015@asdmngwia.udlp.com>
X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.2
X-Original-Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 12:41:34 -0600
From: "Christopher Zavatson" <Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com>
X-Original-To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Hydraulics Problem
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

<<Is it possible the "reversed spool valve" was the design intention of
the manufacturer?>>
We do in fact use the pump in a non-standard configuration with the work
being done during cylinder retraction instead of extension.  Therefore,
when viewing the generic pump schematic from Oildyne, high and low side
are backwards.  
My original pump was assembled correctly.  Some time after '95 the build
instructions from Lancair got mixed up and every pump was being
assembled with a reversed spool valve.  Every pump I have worked on
since then was backwards including the spare I bought for a hydraulics
test bench.  I'm sure there are quite a few out there still needing to
be fixed.
Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360 std