Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 06 Mar 2005 14:59:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imo-m14.mx.aol.com ([64.12.138.204] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c2) with ESMTP id 772519 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Mar 2005 11:51:26 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.138.204; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-m14.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v37_r3.8.) id q.42.647152ce (1320) for ; Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:50:37 -0500 (EST) From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <42.647152ce.2f5c8edd@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:50:37 EST Subject: Re: [LML] Re: .....and mixture settings for take-off and climb. X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="-----------------------------1110127837" X-Mailer: 9.0 Security Edition for Windows sub 5000 -------------------------------1110127837 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit In a message dated 3/6/2005 10:07:39 A.M. Central Standard Time, Walter@advancedpilot.com writes: That is correct on the leaning technique, but that won't result in 120dF ROP shortly after takeoff. It will be much richer than that (250 or so ROP) until you gain quite a bit of altitude. By 12,000 feet or so, that method will usually result in the engine being near best power, which is what you want as you climb higher a NA engine. BTW, you can download a free PPT reader off of the net which will come in handy for quite a few things in the future. Walter, OK, I got it now. Thanks. I'll just have to tighten up my procedure a bit so I can better stay on the wiggly line. You know, I wonder if I read about this in one of Deakin's old AVWEB articles that may have covered this approach. My memory capacity is finite and small - I can only retain the info I need to stay alive - author's name, background, yada, yada, yada........... must be left out to make room. Anyway, we would not have exchanged so many communications if I had used the language of an Advanced Pilot processed thru the Seminar. Scott -------------------------------1110127837 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

In a message dated 3/6/2005 10:07:39 A.M. Central Standard Time,=20 Walter@advancedpilot.com writes:

<= FONT=20 style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: transparent" face=3DArial color=3D#000000 size= =3D2>That is=20 correct on the leaning technique, but that won't result in
120dF ROP=20 shortly after takeoff. It will be much richer than that (250
or=20= so=20 ROP) until you gain quite a bit of altitude. By 12,000 feet or
so, tha= t=20 method will usually result in the engine being near best
power, which=20= is=20 what you want as you climb higher a NA engine.

BTW, you can downloa= d a=20 free PPT reader off of the net which will come
in handy for quite a fe= w=20 things in the future.

Walter,

OK, I got it now. Thanks. I'll just have to tighten up my=20 procedure a bit so I can better stay on the wiggly line.

You know, I wonder if I read about this in one of Deakin's old AVWEB=20 articles that may have covered this approach. My memory capacity is fi= nite=20 and small - I can only retain the info I need to stay alive - author's name,= =20 background, yada, yada, yada........... must be left out to make=20 room.

Anyway, we would not have exchanged so many communications if I ha= d=20 used the language of an Advanced Pilot processed thru=20 the Seminar.

Scott

-------------------------------1110127837--