Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 09 Feb 2005 15:10:11 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.101] (HELO ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3c1) with ESMTP id 721859 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 09 Feb 2005 10:52:05 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.101; envelope-from=hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu Received: from HP780N (cpe-065-184-084-150.nc.rr.com [65.184.84.150]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id j19FoUee015712 for ; Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:50:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Matt Hapgood" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Super Legacy Progress X-Original-Date: Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:50:42 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine -- I usually like to avoid aluminum fittings on the engine altogether, -- but at least avoid aluminum fittings that are built away from the -- block by extensions, nipples, etc. I hear people state that we shouldn't use aluminum fittings on the engine... I don't get it - Lycoming uses many aluminum fittings on the engine. Why is it okay for them to do it but not us? Is their aluminum better? Are the locations less likely to cause fatigue? One person tried to tell me the fittings could melt. That would be very problematic, since many of the engine and block components are made of aluminum (or even lower melting point materials) and I would guess that most of the engine would have melted by the time those fittings melted. So oil lines near the turbo shouldn't be aluminum? Well, there are aluminum parts ON turbos (I don't know specifically about aviation turbos, but I do know about race car turbos and older F1 turbos). The oil flowing through those lines can't be more than about 280 degrees - and aluminum can handle temps that are a multiple of that (and the oil would act as a coolant to any radiated heat from the turbo). Aluminum fittings on my Lycoming (non-turbo) include: * oil return / drains from cylinder heads * prop governor fitting (the line is SS, not the fitting) * breather hose * dipstick housing (actually, I think it is plastic) And I am fairly certain that the parts that come with an FAA approved spin-on oil filter kit include many aluminum fittings. I agree it is important to support the hoses and pipes that lead from any fitting - but where is AL okay and where is it not okay? Do the engine manufacturers have any published comments on this? Thanks, Matt