Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:58:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailout2.pacific.net.au ([61.8.0.85] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.8) with ESMTP id 612399 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 18 Jan 2005 19:16:28 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=61.8.0.85; envelope-from=domcrain@pacific.net.au Received: from mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (mailproxy1.pacific.net.au [61.8.0.86]) by mailout2.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j0J0FwHn007577 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:15:58 +1100 Received: from CRAIN (ppp06A0.dsl.pacific.net.au [203.17.44.160]) by mailproxy1.pacific.net.au (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian-7.1) with ESMTP id j0J0Fvj8009804 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:15:58 +1100 From: "Dominic V. Crain" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Approach control X-Original-Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2005 11:15:55 +1100 X-Original-Message-ID: <002501c4fdbc$0b808eb0$0301010a@CRAIN> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: Dan, If you can read my last post, I trust it clarifies the point. Like you, ASI can be calibrated in parsecs for all I care, but that ain't the point I am making. Regards Dom