Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 15:50:48 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-609354@logan.com>
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.32.5.131; envelope-from=tednoel@cfl.rr.com
From: "Ted Noel" <tednoel@cfl.rr.com>
References: <list-609154@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: more speed
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	format=flowed;
	charset="iso-8859-1";
	reply-type=response
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Rob,

: ((((

The inspection has been delayed to an undetermined time. My money has run 
thin for the moment, and due to engine overheating during testing, we are 
removing it for a complete teardown and inspection. It will be rebuilt when 
money allows. I am guessing about 60-90 days delay.

For any of you who are running liquid cooled engines, don't listen to the 
guys at EvansCooling. They may know their chemistry, but they don't know 
squat about engines. They told me it was OK to run up to 240 degrees with 
their propylene glycol coolant. They let on that the engine would be just 
fine. Their coolant was just fine. The engine tried to destroy itself to 
protect the coolant.

Head gaskets and pistons don't like temps over about 210. Nuff said.

Ted Noel
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2005 1:01 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: more speed


> Posted for "Ted Noel" <tednoel@cfl.rr.com>:
>
>  Berni,
>  I won't comment on your engine choice. But I would heartily recommend the
> AeroComposites prop. It is far and away the best one available. It is 
> lighter,
> stronger, and far more efficient than any of its competitors.
>  Ted Noel
>
> [ Ted! how did the inspection go? you gata be close... -Rob ]
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net/lists/lml/