Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [69.171.52.140] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8)
  with HTTP id 609152 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:00:48 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Observation
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 13:00:48 -0500
Message-ID: <web-609152@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <1fa.309a531.2f1c047c@aol.com>
References: <1fa.309a531.2f1c047c@aol.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for Sky2high@aol.com:
  
  In a message dated 1/16/2005 11:32:27 A.M. Central Standard Time,
  Joe@goldenchoice.com writes:
  
> I don’t’ write often to this  little chat room, but I am compelled to 

  Joe (if that's your name),
  
  Hmmmmm, I read Walter's post as done with tongue in cheek.
  
  It is nice that you chose to join in, but you failed to sign your  post. 
 Tsk
  Tsk!  That fails the reasonable etiquette test.
  
  The LML is like listening to Rush, it must be done regularly to understand
  the nuances.
  
  Remember, Only those that work with glass bubbles can throw micro  around!
  
  [ sig cut to annoy scott -Rob ]
  
Fair  and Balanced Opinions at No Charge!
  There is an oxymoron in that,  somewhere...