Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.163.60] (account marv@lancaironline.net)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.8)
  with HTTP id 600319 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:13:56 -0500
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Approved Weights for Lancair IVP/IVPTs?
To: lml
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.8
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2005 10:13:56 -0500
Message-ID: <web-600319@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <022f01c4f650$34125610$5311020a@nvidia.com>
References: <redirect-600086@logan.com>
 <022f01c4f650$34125610$5311020a@nvidia.com>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "colyncase on earthlink" <colyncase@earthlink.net>:

  Jeff,
     On the "3 for a short one" scenario, Are you saying mainly that you don't
have enough useful load left to put in fuel for a long trip with 3 or that the
3rd person is always uncomfortable in a IVP?
  
  Colyn


"""
Its not that comfortable IMHO with more
than two for a long trip or three for a short one. If you fill up your baggage
area with 100# of luggage and have 145 gallons of fuel you could get this
scenario up to 4127# and be over 1/2 inch aft of aft CG.
"""