Return-Path: Received: from [65.33.163.60] (account marv@lancaironline.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.5) with HTTP id 595688 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:07:47 -0500 From: "Marvin Kaye" Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Approved Weights for Lancair IVP/IVPTs? To: lml X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.5 Date: Sat, 08 Jan 2005 12:07:47 -0500 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <96450-2200516817055304@M2W084.mail2web.com> References: <96450-2200516817055304@M2W084.mail2web.com> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Posted for "ckohler1@cfl.rr.com" : Please let me weigh in on the 4000GW discussion. 1. I Do not believe a IVP will sustain a hard landing (you know--when the wind plays out) without damaging the gear-box at 4000#. {Now thats a real fun job to fix!!!} 2. Will you hire a bonifide test pilot and equip the plane with a spin chute to do the stall flight testing? 3. Stress analysis on the airframe was not based on these higher #'s. Are you SURE it won't break--in flight? 4. High sink rates are much more likely with an engine out--- which is basically unrecoverable below 1000'AGL. Will you find a DAR to do it? Probably--- Will it be insurable?? NO Would I fly it?? NO Will YOU test it?? Charlie K. PS I don't like my airplane much-- at 3400# on a hot summer day.