Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:38:25 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta-out-1.udlp.com ([207.109.1.8] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 591685 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 20:11:48 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.109.1.8; envelope-from=Christopher.Zavatson@udlp.com Received: from asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com (asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com [10.1.62.22]) by mta-out-1.udlp.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j04NAiu2029687 for ; Tue, 4 Jan 2005 17:10:44 -0600 Received: from DM-MN-06-MTA by asdmngwia.mpls.udlp.com with Novell_GroupWise; Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:11:16 -0600 X-Original-Message-Id: X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 6.0.2 X-Original-Date: Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:11:03 -0600 From: "Christopher Zavatson" X-Original-To: Subject: Re: [LML] 235 Near miss Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline <> And here is yet another option...Reamed hinges with close tolerance pins. I have been through a number of hinge iterations over the years: Standard MS hinge and pin. Teflon sleeved pins on new and old MS hinge and finally reamed hinges with close fitting SS pins. Standard MS hinges and pin have lots of play and wear quickly. Teflon lined pins stop/slow down wear but still have play. An exception would be the highly loaded flap hinges were the Teflon sleeve was being sheared by the hinge segments. About two years ago I started switching out all hinges with new reamed hinges and SS pins with a nominal clearance of 0.00175". The pin is 3/32" , 0.09375 welding rod and the MS hinge material is reamed to 0.0955". There is still no perceptible play in the hinges. Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std almost done with conditon inspection #7