Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #27343
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: airspeed vs. power
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 00:10:34 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 12/28/2004 9:08:44 P.M. Central Standard Time, Walter@advancedpilot.com writes:
One of the problems with some fuel pressure systems is that they
maintain a fixed pressure with little change while the FF actually
changes significantly.  If the system is a fuel pressure system of
gauge display, you will not see the FF change that is actually
happening.  If you have a FF transducer in one of those systems, you
can see this by the differences between the two instruments.
Walter, where is this going?  I said I have a fuel flow sensor (located between throttle body and spider) and it did change when the MAP was reduced 1".
 

This is one thing I do not like about the TCM FADEC.  It displays a
fuel pressure which does not change significantly with rather large
changes in FF.

In many carbureted installations, the fuel flow instrument is actually
fuel pressure and does not show the FF changes accurately.  I am not
sure how the Mooney system is set up.  I do have a great deal of
confidence in telling you that as you reduce throttle from WOT, the
first 3/4 to 1 inch of throttle travel does not reduce MP -- it reduces
FF only.  This is the very important fuel enrichment feature that is
built into almost all carburetors.  A very, very few do not have this,
and they are almost always found on turbo-supercharged engines like the
big radials.
I was talking about injected systems.  I have no idea how a Mooney is set up.  I do not have a carburetor. 
 
Anyway, we are so far from my observations that I have no idea what your point is.
 
In a fuel injected system, the reduction of WOT by 1" MAP is a power reduction of similar magnitude as the dropping of the WOT 2500 RPM by 100 - The drop in airspeed should be similar and so should the drop in fuel flow - similar, not identical.  In our slick Lancairs with little parasitic drag, the drop is merely a few knots.  If the "indicated" 1" MAP drop resulted in a large drop in airspeed and fuel flow, there is something wrong with the MAP sensor circuit, such as a problem with the snubber valve (if  VM engine instrumentation is used).  The procedure is an in-flight diagnostic tool.  Do I need more qualifications or specificity?
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Lancair N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR)

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster