Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:32:09 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from lakermmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.240.28] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 582027 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:31:11 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.230.240.28; envelope-from=Walter@advancedpilot.com Received: from [10.0.1.2] (really [68.227.132.71]) by lakermmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-117-20041022) with ESMTP id <20041228143042.NIPY1657.lakermmtao11.cox.net@[10.0.1.2]>; Tue, 28 Dec 2004 09:30:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-12--764491847 X-Original-Message-Id: <0E30EBF1-58DD-11D9-A142-000D933276F6@advancedpilot.com> From: W Atkinson Subject: Re: [LML] Re: airspeed vs. power X-Original-Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2004 08:30:43 -0600 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) --Apple-Mail-12--764491847 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Scott: Reducing MP 1" from WOT will not give proper FF change readings as the=20= fuel enrichment feature causes a larger drop in FF than MP as the=20 throttle is first retarded. This results in a a leaning effect and the=20= mixture is not staying the same. The drop in FF as RPM is retarded is=20= a much more accurate measure as the the change in the engine driven=20 fuel pump allows the mixture to remain fairly constant. Walter On Dec 27, 2004, at 5:39 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: Matt, =A0 Thanks for the data. =A0 1. What was the MAP and Baro readings taken before engine start?=A0 =A0 2.=A0 How do you explain the magic of TAS in trial 3? =A0 Interestingly enough, 4 people have used this to recognize problems=20 with the "snubber valve" on the engine side of the firewall for VM=20 systems.=A0 Trial 1 and 2 are consistent with respect to all variables,=20= change in MAP, fuel flow and airspeed.=A0 A good way to test this=20 particular instrumentation is, at a reasonable cruise altitude and WOT,=20= reduce the MAP by 1" and record the change in fuel flow and speed -=20 after returning to WOT, reduce the RPM by 100 and record the change in=20= fuel flow and airspeed.=A0 These numbers should be within 5-10% of each=20= other.=A0 If not, something is wrong. =A0 Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR) --Apple-Mail-12--764491847 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/enriched; charset=ISO-8859-1 Scott: Reducing MP 1" from WOT will not give proper FF change readings as the fuel enrichment feature causes a larger drop in FF than MP as the throttle is first retarded. This results in a a leaning effect and the mixture is not staying the same. The drop in FF as RPM is retarded is a much more accurate measure as the the change in the engine driven fuel pump allows the mixture to remain fairly constant. Walter On Dec 27, 2004, at 5:39 PM, Sky2high@aol.com wrote: ArialMatt, Arial=A0 ArialThanks for the = data. Arial=A0 Arial1. What was the MAP and Baro readings taken before engine start?=A0 Arial =A0 Arial2.=A0 How do you explain the magic of TAS in trial 3? Arial=A0 ArialInterestingly enough, 4 people have used this to recognize problems with the "snubber valve" on the engine side of the firewall for VM systems.=A0 Trial 1 and 2 are consistent with respect to all variables, change in MAP, fuel flow and airspeed.=A0 A good way to test this particular instrumentation is, at a reasonable cruise altitude and WOT, reduce the MAP by 1" and record the change in fuel flow and speed - after returning to WOT, reduce the RPM by 100 and record the change in fuel flow and airspeed.=A0 These numbers should be within 5-10% of each other.=A0 If not, something is wrong. Arial =A0 ArialScott Krueger AKA = Grayhawk ArialN92EX IO320 Aurora, IL = (KARR) --Apple-Mail-12--764491847--