Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:26:43 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [24.25.9.102] (HELO ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 581273 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:12:59 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=24.25.9.102; envelope-from=hapgoodm94@alum.darden.edu Received: from HP780N (cpe-024-163-071-007.nc.rr.com [24.163.71.7]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.southeast.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id iBRFCNkd002154 for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:12:26 -0500 (EST) From: "Matt Hapgood" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: airspeed vs. power X-Original-Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 10:12:32 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_003E_01C4EBFC.94702540" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-reply-to: Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C4EBFC.94702540 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Here are some results from my flight test last week. Matt FLIGHT TEST DATA Aircraft N# ___366B______ Model ____360________ Date of flight _____12/22______ Time off _8:30AM___ Time on _11:15 AM Test I Test 2 Test 3 Test 4 Test 5 Test 6 Indicated altitude 8000 8000 9000 Pressure altitude 7610 7610 Density altitude 8320 8320 OAT 2 C 2 C MAP (Not Nec. WOT) 23.0 22.0 22.0 RPM 2400 2400 2400 Fuel flow (gph) 8.8 8.1 8.2 EGT range (100 LOP) 1320 - 1440 1330 - 1420 CHT range 270 - 298 270 - 295 Knots calibrated airspeed 182 177 177 Knots true airspeed 203 199 204 Turbulence smooth air smooth air smooth air -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Metcalfe, Lee, AIR Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:39 PM To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: [LML] Re: airspeed vs. power Looks like a lot of us are goofing off today!?!? Here's a spreadsheet I just did to capture data for the GFTP (Grayhawk Flight Test Protocol). Moondog ------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C4EBFC.94702540 Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Here are some = results=20 from my flight test last week. Matt FLIGHT TEST DATA
Aircraft N# ___366B______	Model ____360________	Date of flight = _____12/22______	Time off _8:30AM___	Time on _11:15 AM

	Test I	Test 2	Test 3	Test 4	Test 5	Test 6
Indicated altitude	8000	8000	9000
Pressure altitude	7610	7610
Density altitude	8320	8320
OAT	2 C	2 C
MAP (Not Nec. WOT)	23.0	22.0	22.0
RPM	2400	2400	2400
Fuel flow (gph)	8.8	8.1	8.2
EGT range (100 LOP)	1320 - 1440	1330 - 1420
CHT range	270 - 298	270 - 295
Knots calibrated airspeed	182	177	177
Knots true airspeed	203	199	204
Turbulence	smooth air	smooth air	smooth air

-----Original Message-----
From: Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net]On Behalf Of Metcalfe, Lee,=20 AIR
Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2004 12:39 PM
To: = Lancair=20 Mailing List
Subject: [LML] Re: airspeed vs.=20 power

Looks=20 like a lot of us are goofing off today!?!? Here's a spreadsheet = I just=20 did to capture data for the GFTP (Grayhawk Flight Test=20 Protocol).

Moondog

------=_NextPart_000_003E_01C4EBFC.94702540--