Return-Path: Sender: "Marvin Kaye" To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2004 07:31:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mail.pshift.com ([63.166.217.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5) with ESMTP id 581140 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:49:10 -0500 Received-SPF: neutral receiver=logan.com; client-ip=63.166.217.30; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net Received: from ccaselt (unverified [206.229.199.250]) by mail.pshift.com (Vircom SMTPRS 4.0.330.8) with SMTP id for ; Mon, 27 Dec 2004 01:42:34 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <394301c4ebdf$572a4980$e010020a@nvidia.com> From: "colyncase on earthlink" X-Original-To: Subject: IVP AC followup questions X-Original-Date: Sun, 26 Dec 2004 22:43:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_3940_01C4EB9C.4895F830" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_3940_01C4EB9C.4895F830 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In earlier postings there was some debate about airflow vs. aerocool = systems. I read through all that and went to the websites and am left with these = questions: 1) Charlie Kohler alluded to a comment from Martin Hollman that cutting = big holes through the bottom of the fuselage (like Aero-cool does) is = uncharted territory. Did anyone do any kind of analysis (computer or = otherwise) to prove or disprove this? 2) Does anyone have numbers for drag on the scoopless Aero-cool system = when NOT operating? (okay I'll take operating too) 3) I could not find on the airflow site how the system actually works. = In particular, how is the plumbing done? Does it require coolant lines = running across the front of the gear box and down into the condenser? = Then how does it go to the evaporator? thanks, Colyn Case ------=_NextPart_000_3940_01C4EB9C.4895F830 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
In earlier postings there was some = debate about=20 airflow vs. aerocool systems.
I read through all that and went to the = websites=20 and am left with these questions:
 
1) Charlie Kohler alluded to a comment = from Martin=20 Hollman that cutting big holes through the bottom of the fuselage (like=20 Aero-cool does) is uncharted territory.   Did anyone do any = kind of=20 analysis (computer or otherwise) to prove or disprove this?
 
2) Does anyone have numbers for drag on = the=20 scoopless Aero-cool system when NOT operating? (okay I'll take operating = too)
 
3) I could not find on the airflow site = how the=20 system actually works.  In particular, how is the plumbing=20 done?   Does it require coolant lines running across the front = of the=20 gear box and down into the condenser?   Then how does it go to = the=20 evaporator?
 
thanks,
 
Colyn Case
------=_NextPart_000_3940_01C4EB9C.4895F830--