Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2004 09:51:39 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-543019@logan.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Don Barnes <don@cellarideas.com>
Subject: 25 vs 40 hours

There's no negotiating the hours. I got 40 because the engine isn't a 
"factory new" or certified (Even though I think it's better). It also 
passes down to the prop/engine combination too. Funny thing is that the 
FAA inspector was going to give me 25 hours and Dave Saylor of 
AirCrafters educated him of the difference. It's always good to have 
someone who knows what they're doing look at your plane.

Not to say that all FAA guys are ignorant. The second inspector that 
came out was sharp. Just that you don't know who you'll get and it's 
quite an investment of money and time to trust in the FAA. Having a 
good EAA advisor or someone that is familiar with our aircraft is a 
must for safety and piece of mind.

I'm sure EAA will revise this someday and lift the 100 mile fence. Some 
get 100 miles and others get whatever they want. There doesn't seem to 
be a standard, just how it is now. The Legacy covers 100 miles pretty 
quick. Steve Willams informed me of a revision to the guidelines that 
have lifted the 50-100 mile restrictions. (Steve could you post that 
advisery#).

Hope that helps,
Don