Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 12:40:46 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-536241@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <lancair@ustek.com>
Received: from esmtp.cave.com ([66.35.72.5] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.5)
  with ESMTP id 535867 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:08:38 -0500
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=66.35.72.5; envelope-from=lancair@ustek.com
Received: from ustek.com ([66.35.73.227])
        by esmtp.cave.com (VisNetic.MailServer.v7.2.4.1) with ESMTP id CQN38002
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:07:46 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <419B4D24.2070108@ustek.com>
X-Original-Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2004 08:07:48 -0500
From: "Robert M. Simon" <lancair@ustek.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: VFR for flight testing
References: <list-533174@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <list-533174@logan.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Ron Galbraith wrote:

> > Posted for "Jim Auman" :
> just put experimental in remarks.  That way the information is 
> automated to the guys who need that information (the ones at the tower). 
>
Jim,

So the tower would handle a Lancair with a standard certificate 
(Columbia 400) different than an ES with an experimental certificate?  
Is not the type sufficient to know the capabilities of the aircraft? 


Robert M. Simon, 

ES-P N301ES