Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 02 Sep 2004 00:06:06 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vineyard.net ([204.17.195.90] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 389419 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:47:56 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=204.17.195.90; envelope-from=ted@vineyard.net Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by vineyard.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C03C49156A for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from vineyard.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (king1.vineyard.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 03746-01-64 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:47:26 -0400 (EDT) Received: from direct (fsy5.vineyard.net [66.101.65.5]) by vineyard.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 219B991558 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:47:26 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <001901c4909f$d1549e40$05416542@direct> From: "Ted Stanley" X-Original-To: "Mail List Lancair" Subject: TKS Propeller Anti/Deicing X-Original-Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 23:49:12 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2720.3000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-king1 at Vineyard.NET Has anyone installed and had occasion to use a propeller that utilizes TKS fluid anti/deicing in icing conditions? I've heard some suggestion that the "overspray" during operation might actually protect parts of the airframe (windshield and tail in particular) in addition to just the propeller. If true this might be worth further investigation. Ted Stanley