Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #25202
From: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: GRT EFIS
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 15:02:29 -0400
To: <lml>
Posted for Clark Baker <cbaker@elliottadvisors.co.uk>:

 <<I'd also love to hear about your experience with the GRT EFIS -Rob <<
 
 Rob,
 My impressions so far with the GRT EFIS have been very positive on our 22
 hour Atlantic Crossing.  The engine monitoring system in excellent, and is
 one of the strong features.  It is highly customizable, with full alert
 capabilities and GRT is continuing to update and improve the software.  I
 especially liked all the information and the trend monitoring when 300nm
 from dry land.
 We didn't have a chance to use the map pages much.  I already had the GNS
 530 and Sandel HSI so I continued to just use them.  Big key feature appears
 to be a good database and FREE updates. When the ARINC 429 interface is
 ready, the EFIS will be able to faction as the VOR/LOC/GS head for the 530.
 I was very happy with the PFD screen.  The information and layout are well
 done.  Before the trip, Pete Zacaganino put the plane through some very
 aggressive manoeuvres ours to test the quality of the attitude data.  The
 instrument performed extremely well, with no noticeable errors or lag.
 Readability in all conditions has been very good.  I understand the attitude
 information will work completely independent of magnetic, gps, or air data
 information and perform at an acceptable level. However, these 3 inputs
 improve the quality of the attitude data under more demanding flight
 regimes.
 The quality of the components and display appear extremely high.  Customer
 support from Greg and Todd, like usual, has been excellent.  However, bear
 in mind that they are still adding features, revising the operating manual,
 etc.
 Compared to the traditional mechanical instruments, it appears the way to
 go.  Previously, I had two RCAllen 12v gyros (over $2000 each), plus the
 usual steam gauges.  The GRT appears to be a quantum leap in functionality,
 reliability, and safety, at a nominally higher price (cheaper in the long
 term?).  The leap in functionality versus the standard 6 pack is amazing.
 Plus, weight savings to boot.
 I also ordered the TruTrak Digiflight IIVSGV (lateral and vertical GPS
 steering).  For now, TT is only shipping the IIVS so that is what I am using
 until the VSGV is ready.  When GRT and TT complete their software, you will
 be able to preselect the altitude and climb rate for the AP from the GRT
 EFIS.  You can also fly a heading bug from the EFIS.
 I have not flown the Chelton/Sierra (only hanger flown) so I can't compare.
 But at $25k+ it is in a somewhat different category.  I have also not flown
 the BMA, buy chose the GRT for its size, design robustness (didn't like all
 the complexity of the BMA system), and my very positive experience working
 with Greg and Todd over the past 7-8 years.  While I always like more
 features, my first concern is reliability and basic functionality at
 critical times.
 Regards,
 Clark Baker
 
http://www.lancair.net/pix/uk/P1010320
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster