Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 09:44:21 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2) with ESMTP id 387759 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 01:40:12 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=68.168.78.199; envelope-from=dfs155@adelphia.net Received: from f3g6s4 ([67.22.49.202]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.03.02 201-2131-111-104-20040324) with SMTP id <20040901053941.NNVH2583.mta9.adelphia.net@f3g6s4> for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 01:39:41 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <004701c48fe6$26061780$ca311643@losaca.adelphia.net> From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: Redundancy pays X-Original-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 22:40:10 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 I've rethought my earlier "wimpy" response on the subject of "flying with a known deficiency" and have a few more things to say on the subject. At the time I decided to fly home, my airplane was in a condition similar to a lot of certificated spam cans - at that time only one device was keeping the mixture in the full rich position - the spring I had installed for just such an occasion. Apparently, C and P can get an airplane certificated (what ever happened to the word "certified"?) without such a backup, meaning that the Feds think that requiring a belt and suspenders approach isn't all that necessary. I even considered the possibility of needing to adjust the mixture on the flight home and rejected it out of hand. I was taking off at about 2500 ASL, climbing to no more than 3500 ASL, and landing at ~2500 ASL. The only use I could conceive of that might require fiddling with the mixture control was for shut-down at my home airport. I certainly had no intention of screwing with it for other than shut-down (and I certainly hadn't figured that was needed in the air!). In fact, Lycoming tells users of my engine type that leaning below 4 - 5000 Ft ASL at full power is strictly verboten! Last, since I built it and have the Repairman's certificate for it, I make a judgment on my airplane's airworthiness after every condition inspection (or annual) and every time I fix or service something on it. As far as I'm concerned, I was reaping the benefits of some forethought regarding what I believe are deficiencies in what is taken for "standard practice", e.g., NO back-up for a failed control. 'Nuff said! Dan Schaefer