Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 21:31:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailgate-internal2.sri.com ([128.18.84.104] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with SMTP id 145026 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 19:59:47 -0400 Received: (qmail 6229 invoked from network); 8 Jun 2004 23:59:17 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO mailgate-internal2.SRI.COM) (127.0.0.1) by mailgate-internal2.sri.com with SMTP; 8 Jun 2004 23:59:17 -0000 Received: from mercury.esd.sri.com ([128.18.26.21]) by mailgate-internal2.SRI.COM (SAVSMTP 3.1.2.35) with SMTP id M2004060816591706555 for ; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 16:59:17 -0700 Received: from lowpc (thomas-l-ej315.SRI.COM [128.18.6.82]) by mercury.esd.sri.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HZ000B6TLFZXO@mercury.esd.sri.com> for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 17:02:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2004 16:59:17 -0700 From: Thomas Low Subject: Prop Strike In-reply-to: X-Original-To: 'Lancair Mailing List' X-Original-Message-id: <020701c44db4$9bab8de0$52061280@esd.sri.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal List Back in 1997, I purchased a Lancair 235 which had very limited documentation. A spent the next three years with the aircraft in my garage, going over, rebuilding, or replacing everything that wasn't perfect. Rash on the belly suggested a gear-up incident in the planes history, so for good measure, in 1998 had the O235-L2C engine torn down by an FAA certified repair facility (Air West San Carlos CA), had AD 91 14-22 complied with, as well as SB 505B and 530. They confirmed the engine in perfect order, consistent with the sellers claim that it had been 18 hours SMOH, although it had been inoperative for many years. Only weeks after my first flight in the aircraft, I was taxing back to my hangar, and ran the nose wheel over a storm drain installed on the taxiway centerline, causing damage to the tips of the wood prop at idle RPM. The only indication I had that the prop had been hit was the sight of wood splinters flying away. Damage was limited to within 1 or 2 inches of the tip. No momentary RPM drop was noted. I shut down immediately, and pushed the plane back to the hangar. After replacement of the prop with an identical new unit, I returned the aircraft to service, and since have put a little more than 100 hours on the tach. Now I'm looking at AD2004-10-14. To comply, I should have the crankshaft gear inspected, which I am inclined to do. I would be very surprised if the shop finds anything. The question is whether a full TDI is necessary or prudent. Some shops won't perform the AD prescribed inspection unless a TDI is done as well, as they don't want the liability. Obviously, cost is a factor, but also the loss of reliability that seems to come with any major repair. Things are finally working perfectly, no more leaks, manifold cracks, temps are great, oil burn is low. I hate to mess with this. What would you do. PS: I've got three young children, and a great wife. Thanks in advance for your advice. Tom Low