Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:50:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta9.adelphia.net ([68.168.78.199] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b5) with ESMTP id 141850 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 15:43:36 -0400 Received: from f3g6s4 ([69.166.117.156]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with SMTP id <20040606194306.XVBK26615.mta9.adelphia.net@f3g6s4> for ; Sun, 6 Jun 2004 15:43:06 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: <005b01c44bfe$7cd189e0$9c75a645@losaca.adelphia.net> From: "Dan Schaefer" X-Original-To: "Lancair list" Subject: Re: [LML] Wing Wire conduct X-Original-Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 12:43:05 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Re: Giff Marr's question: In my humble opinion, the conduit material should be slightly flexible (unlike an aluminum tube) to allow for the inevitable wing flexure without overly stressing (and possible failure) of the bond at the ribs - which would probably result in a fuel leak, big time. Since the ribs are completely bonded around their periphery, they are probably too stiff, laterally, to allow much give when the wing flexes, thereby putting most of the stress on the tube-to-rib bond. On my early 235, I put the wing fuel between the spars in the inboard section of the outer wing. As such, I also had to put a push-rod tube through the fuel bays. I built them of fiberglass (about 2" diameter, about three layers) around a cylinder of foam, later dissolved out with solvent, and installed between the ribs. After installation, the tubes were sealed with the the same tank sealer used for the tanks and have been leak-free for over ten years. Dan Schaefer