Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 00:26:03 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.48] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2938099 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 23:47:44 -0500 Received: from 0-1pool121-139.nas9.tucson1.az.us.da.qwest.net ([67.0.121.139] helo=Downstairs) by mallard.mail.pas.earthlink.net with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AiRKA-0006nQ-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:47:43 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <001301c3de47$5d680bd0$0100a8c0@Downstairs> From: "Robert Smiley" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Internally lit instruments X-Original-Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2004 20:47:37 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Skip, Great idea for independent redundancy for hard IFR guys. Bob Smiley One thing I'd consider doing differently though after hearing about > Ron's pitot related Legacy accident is mounting a second pitot tube on the > opposite wing from the first one and plumbing that tube to the RMI instead > of teeing off the existing tube. That way you have two completely > independent sources of information.