Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:42:28 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net ([207.217.120.120] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP id 2931830 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:12:23 -0500 Received: from dialup-67.31.195.164.dial1.tampa1.level3.net ([67.31.195.164] helo=earthlink.net) by albatross.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1Aglkr-0002dT-00 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 14 Jan 2004 06:12:22 -0800 X-Original-Message-ID: <40054E55.3050601@earthlink.net> X-Original-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2004 09:12:37 -0500 From: Capt D User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 (ax) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: lml RE: Monroy ATD 200/300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I've used the ATD 200 on a few occaisions just to test it prior to panel mounting. It does give a useful 'heads up', and makes you spot traffic that ATC didn't call. One of it's shortcomings is reporting multiple targets. In that case, it may flip between one and the other forcing you to figure it out. In that case I think my older model has the edge. A row of LEDs are alot easier to see than a changing digital readout. I was condsidering the ATD 300, but unless I get a good offer on it, my 200 is fine. D. Story LNC2 Nice PA-30 for sale also. ;-)