Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #22198
From: Steve Reeves <sreeves@sc.rr.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: To header or not to header
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 12:57:35 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
For the record my Glasair does not have a header tank as well.  It's not a problem for me because with my 0-320, I'm only burning around 7gph and I carry 34 gallons of fuel.  I generally only fly about 3 hours (or 4 max) before I have to hit the potty anyway.  I also have an access panel up front that makes avionics work a snap.  I suppose there are benefits to both configurations, but I didn't care for the fact of having a load of fuel near my avionics & engine.

Steve
Glasair 1FT 343ND



t 07:01 PM 1/12/2004, you wrote:
LNC2 Crowd,

I completely agree with Ian Crowe about getting rid of the header tank.  I did not like:
 1. the safely issue of having fuel between me and a hot engine,
 2. variable weight off the CG,
 3. worrying about keeping the header full and not pumping it overboard.

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster