From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] To header or not to header
To: lml
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 18:59:48 -0500
Message-ID: <web-2929576@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <070d01c3d962$b71e6230$6501a8c0@OFFICE>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Bill&Sue" <5zq@cox.net>:


  >   If anyone really needs the fuel in the header PLUS the extra wing fuel 
he 
> doesn't have a bladder he has a reservoir.


   Hello Ian,

   I sure liked having the extended wing fuel AND the header on our flight 
from 
Virginia to Europe in our 320 this Summer. You don't have to USE the fuel for 
it to be of great value to you. On long trips, especially IFR, just having the 
reserve, even if you'd have to pee your pants to actually USE it, sure is 
nice. 

   Bill Harrelson
   5zq@cox.net    N5ZQ   LNC2  O-320    Dogwood Airpark      Fredericksburg, 
VA 
       700 hours