Return-Path: Received: from [67.20.112.52] (account rob HELO Logan.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with ESMTP-TLS id 2927693 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:13:13 -0500 Message-ID: <40017659.8030200@Logan.com> Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 11:14:17 -0500 From: Rob Logan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; SunOS sun4u; en-US; rv:1.0.1) Gecko/20020921 Netscape/7.0 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: Pillar Point Fuel Sensor Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: RWolf99@aol.com Thanks for all the responses. Probably the most revealing was Bob Belshe's which said that bubbles get pumped thru the fuel lines but when the pump shuts off, the fuel drops back towards the pump, which would basically fill the fuel line downstream of the pump and "spoof" the fuel sensor. This is what I expected but was hoping that I'd hear differently. So I guess I need to do what I should have planned all along, which is to have the sensor mounted in the stub wing so the pump will suck the line dry. Frankly, I don't expect to be running the wing tanks dry very often -- and I asked about this last year in this forum and found that very few of "all y'all" do, either. Gee, all this newfangled high-tech gizmos -- sometimes I think the early Lancair guys with the mechanical trim systems and sight tubes and stone simple solutions that don't use electricity might have been on to something after all..... Thanks for all the comments. I'm hoping to fly it to Oshkosh in 2005 but my day job gets in the way. I think I'll be spending at least 4 of the next 5 "days off" in the office. (Whine, whine....) I'm not really complaining about the job but it is quite effective at keeping me out of the garage! - Rob Wolf LNC2 70% and holding....