Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #22090
From: <Sky2high@aol.com>
Sender: Marvin Kaye <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Hobbs Meter
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:29:08 -0500
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
In a message dated 1/5/2004 8:12:04 PM Central Standard Time, dannycreech@yahoo.com writes:
All Inspections are
done off the tach.
<<<I'm looking for some input from the collective wisdom of the LML. What do you think? The ol' hobbs or the new-fangled SFS timer? Or are both equally as good?>>>
Danny, Ron, Et Al...
 
Geeeez, I do my inspections off the calendar flip at fiscal year end... And, I fix everything as it breaks - 100 hours or not.  My Hobb's meter comes on with the master switch - Thus, I got my FAA mandated 40 hours logged pretty quick.  Tach time shows about 600 hours and the Hoobs about 850 - Maybe next year I can park with the 1000 hour experimentals at OSH if I run my battery down a few times more. 
 
Tach time is for engines, Hobbs is for the loving abuse I give my airframe, aloft or otherwise.  Actually, I should count cycles since my brakes and wheels only understand the sweet kiss of the pavement....  I know that my wing leading edge maintenance it based on bug and trash impingement levels - the canopy is only cleaned when the reported visibilty is greater than how far I can see.
 
I write down both values in my log books so that the accident investigator will be confused. 
 
PS- 100 hrs in a J3 is somewhat different than 100 hrs in a Lancair.
 
Scott Krueger AKA Grayhawk
Sky2high@aol.com
II-P N92EX IO320 Aurora, IL (KARR)

"...as we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don't know we don't know." D. Rumsfeld
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster