Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sat, 06 Dec 2003 13:26:23 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [68.248.4.52] (HELO smtp.StdDtaSys.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8) with SMTP id 2840077 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:48:21 -0500 Received: from lorn.StdDtaSys.com [10.0.1.202] by pop.StdDtaSys.com (AppleMailServer 10.2.3.0) id 2473 via TCP with SMTP; Sat, 06 Dec 2003 12:48:19 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v606) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed X-Original-Message-Id: <60312F75-2814-11D8-98B5-000393C2C1A6@dynacomm.ws> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Original-Cc: "Paul Nafziger" From: Lorn H. Olsen Subject: Re: Vortex Generators X-Original-Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2003 12:48:18 -0500 X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.606) > From: "Paul Nafziger" > > Jack, I doubt it will bother me.=A0 I used to deadstick F-104s. > =A0 > Naf > > Paul Nafziger > LNC2 N7PN > I think the answer to that will become abundantly clear the first time=20= > you try to dead-stick one of those puppies. > > Jack Kane The F-105 POH made it look a lot easier. Just eject. It stated that you=20= would probably not survive an engine out landing. I am surprised that=20 the F-104 was better? But for our LNC2's, Jack Web, for my bi-annual, had me over an airport=20= at 1,000. We did a 360 at 120 mph and still had 200 ft to lose before=20 landing, which was easy with gear prop and flaps. My Commanche took=20 1,000 feet to do a 180. The LNC2 is a much better, although faster,=20 glider. -- Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, DynaComm, Corp. 248-478-4300, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.ws LNC2, O-320-D1F, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan=