Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net> (Marvin Kaye)
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 09:11:29 -0500
Message-ID: <redirect-2717232@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <harrelson@erols.com>
Received: from smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.4.60] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6)
  with ESMTP id 2716667 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 21:05:48 -0500
Received: from 208-59-159-217.s471.tnt2.frdb.va.dialup.rcn.com ([208.59.159.217] helo=OFFICE)
	by smtp01.mrf.mail.rcn.net with smtp (Exim 3.35 #3)
	id 1AJ1R1-0002BL-00
	for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 09 Nov 2003 21:05:43 -0500
X-Original-Message-ID: <154901c3a72f$23fb5040$569e3bd0@OFFICE>
From: "Bill & Sue" <harrelson@erols.com>
X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" <lml@lancaironline.net>
References: <list-2712211@logan.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: LNC2 NACA air ducts
X-Original-Date: Sun, 9 Nov 2003 21:05:39 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000

> Several builders have remarked that at low air speeds there is very
> little flow of air from these ducts into the cockpit and that in some
> instances, air is actually sucked OUT.  Do any of you think that air
> flow into the cockpit could be improved through these ducts if the
> various openings in the cockpit closeout ribs could be sealed off with
> boots?
>
> Angier Ames
>


Angier,

Yes, the better the seal on any openings to the cockpit the better.
However... a  good seal on all of your gear doors will do a great deal
without any other effort.

Bill
harrelson@erols.com
N5ZQ  LNC2  O-320  VA42  Fredericksburg, VA